In recent years, the issue of PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) has dominated headlines due to their widespread use in consumer products and associated health risks. PFAS, known as 'forever chemicals' for their persistent nature and potential health impacts such as cancer and immune system disorders, have prompted significant legislative responses at both federal and state levels.
Photo: Dreamstime
Governments, including the Biden-Harris administration, have taken proactive steps to address PFAS contamination. At the state level, initiatives in 34 states have introduced over 300 policies targeting PFAS, particularly in products like carpets, textiles, and paints.
California has classified rugs and carpets with PFAS as a priority for toxic substance control, influencing similar actions in other states. Colorado has passed legislation banning indoor and outdoor furnishings with intentionally added PFAS by 2027, with New York considering similar measures by 2026, coupled with mandatory product labelling requirements akin to California's Proposition 65.
Major retailers and manufacturers have already started phasing out PFAS from their products. Ikea eliminated PFAS from its textiles in 2016 and continues efforts across its product range, while Home Depot plans to offer PFAS-free patio and decor items by 2025. Industry giants such as Crypton and Sunbrella have also removed PFAS from their performance fabrics.
However, while the shift away from PFAS is promising, concerns linger about alternative chemicals used to replicate their functional properties.
Historically, replacing one harmful chemical with another less-studied alternative, as seen with bisphenol A (BPA) and its substitutes, has raised similar health concerns. This highlights a critical challenge for manufacturers: finding safer alternatives without inadvertently introducing new risks.
Source: www.businessofhome.com